National Cyber Warfare Foundation (NCWF)

DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace


0 user ratings
2025-10-28 15:23:07
milo
Developers

DAST vs AI Code: TL;DR


Traditional DAST requires 8+ hours for comprehensive scanning while AI-generated code deploys 10 times daily. This speed mismatch creates a fundamental security gap: most organizations run DAST weekly, leaving 70+ deployments unchecked between scans. The Contrast Runtime Security Platform offers a fundamentally different approach by embedding security directly into application runtime to detect vulnerabilities as they deploy and block attacks as they happen.


The post DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace appeared first on Security Boulevard.



Jake Milstein

Source: Security Boulevard
Source Link: https://securityboulevard.com/2025/10/dast-vs-ai-code-why-dynamic-application-security-testing-cant-keep-pace/


Comments
new comment
Nobody has commented yet. Will you be the first?
 
Forum
Developers



Copyright 2012 through 2025 - National Cyber Warfare Foundation - All rights reserved worldwide.